I love my little Olympus Stylus Epic, with it’s fast prime lens and almost total lack of options (yes that’s a good thing), but after my recent trip I think I finally got to the point where it just doesn’t make sense to shoot 35mm for random snapshots anymore. After spending almost $60 getting less than a dozen rolls processed, and spending almost a whole day scanning shots of varying quality, not to mention the hassle of finding decent quality film on the go (why can’t grocery stores carry Portra next to the Max 800?), I think it’s time to get a digital point and shooter.
But what to get? I thought I had pretty well decided on the as-yet-unreleased Canon Powershot TX-1. It’s actually more video camera than still cam, with 720p HD video, which I was going dig, as video is something I’ve been meaning to dabble more in (I’m gunning for you Wes Anderson), but still with a decent 7 megapixel still camera in it (usually the combo video/still cams are really good in one or the other). But then Sigma has to go and drop their new DP1, with it’s prime lens, RAW file capabilities, and the much-touted Foveon 3-layer sensor (not to mention it just looks hot). It doesn’t help that Leica/Panasonic keep making their D-Lux cameras pretty interesting as well.
So which direction to go in; the more capable but a little overwrought video-cam-plus-halfway-decent-still-cam, or a fully capable compact still camera that doesn’t look like a robot crapped it out? I guess it’s nice to have options.
More on the Sigma DP1:
- 2point8
- The Online Photographer
- As other’s have mentioned, the Sigma is almost what Eliot Shepard was asking for
- James Duncan Davidson
- DPReview has pictures of the DP1